The War Over Obscene Web Names Is On
by Mark Prigg
LONDON — A row has broken out over the right to register obscene domain
Network Solutions, the American company that is in charge of registering .com
addresses, has refused to register dozens of domains that include words it deems
The company is now fighting a court battle with Seven Words, another American
company, which claims that under its right to free speech it should be allowed to
register any name.
Nancy Huddlestone of Network Solutions says the company has always refused
to to register offensive names.
"However, we do look at the policies on a case by case basis," she says. "For
instance, we used to reject domains with 'shit' in them. A lot of Japanese words
contain that, and in particular a lot of shiitake mushroom growers were upset, so
we let that through."
Jay Spillane, the lawyer representing Seven Words, says Network Solutions has
no right to withold the names.
"In the US we all have a right to free speech, as part of the First Amendment, and
this company is not allowing that," he says. "It's something it just can't do, and we
will fight to get the names released."
The names have been placed on hold pending the result of the court hearing.
Spillane refused to reveal what his client was planning to do with the domains, but
admitted they were "very lucrative". Several of the names refer to sexual acts that
are often typed into a web browser by users looking for pornography.
Ivan Pope, founder of NetNames, a UK-based company that registers domain
names, believes Network Solutions is misusing its monopoly. "It was simply a
case of being in the right place at the right time," he says. "It was given the
contract to run the database of Net names before the Net really took off. It
makes $70 per domain name registered, and with about 4m names registered,
that is something it doesn't want to give up.
"This is a company that is a law unto itself — it pretty much makes up its own
rules. It says what is offensive and what isn't. It was quite happy to register
nigger.com, for instance, which is probably far more offensive to people than the
names it withholds.
"Some perfectly acceptable names also have problems. For instance, we have
had problems in the past registering names with the place Scunthorpe in them."
Network Solutions was due to give other companies direct access to the
database of Net names in 1998, but has managed to delay the move.
The U.S. Justice Department is now to investigate the company's monopoly, and
could demand it allows other Net-naming companies, such as Pope's NetNames,
access to the database.
In Britain, registration of .co.uk domain names is handled by Nominet, a
non-profit-making organization, which has no restrictions on domain-name
A British company, funmail, a free Web-based e-mail service, recently registered
hundreds of offensive names to stop them falling into the wrong hands.
Funmail plans to give the names to a racial-equality organisation for safe keeping.
IMPORTANT NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.|